SuperAssets vs MaintainX
MaintainX has $254M in funding. It still has no asset hierarchy.
MaintainX is a horizontal CMMS with strong mobile UX and $254M in funding. It uses flat asset lists with no hierarchy, no blueprints, and per-user pricing ($16–49/user) that gets expensive for large frontline teams.
See SuperAssets in action →What MaintainX does well
We're direct. Here's where they're strong:
- Best-in-class mobile UX
- AI anomaly detection shipping
- Large install base (13,000+ companies)
Where SuperAssets wins
MaintainX is generic across industries with no verticalization, no hierarchy, and no blueprints. These are architectural gaps, not feature gaps. A 200-room hotel with 40 workers pays $1,960/month on MaintainX just for seats.
Side-by-side comparison
| Capability | SuperAssets | MaintainX |
|---|---|---|
| Hierarchical Assets (unlimited depth) | ✓✓ | ✗ |
| Blueprint System | ✓✓ | ✗ |
| 5-View Operations Cockpit | ✓✓ | ✗ |
| Industry Verticalization | ✓✓ | ✗ |
| Automation Rules Engine | ✓✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-Tenant Hierarchy | ✓✓ | ~ |
| Per-Asset Pricing | ✓✓ | ✗ |
| Work Orders / Preventive Maintenance | ✓ | ✓✓ |
| PMS / System Integrations | ✓ | ✗ |
| AI / Predictive Features | ~ | ✓✓ |
✓✓ = Best-in-class · ✓ = Solid · ~ = Partial · ✗ = Absent
See the blueprint run live.
Request a personalized demo. We'll deploy a complete floor (rooms, equipment, and operational schedules) in under 10 minutes, then show you what it looks like for your specific use case.